Yup that'll do...picture is avril lavigne
going back to sbr days, kind of an inside joke since someone said i was a superfan lol
If my profit was so doubled from a “glitch” then taking away the double means cutting it in half.For example- you wager $60,000 in Blackjack. You return $60,000 in Blackjack so you breakeven. $30,000 in wagers lost. $30,000 in wagers won. Those $30,000 in winning wagers were doubled. Now you've won $30,000 on $60,000 in wagers. If they weren't doubled you would be breakeven. So again-you would NOT have still been profitable $15,000 if a glitch doubled your winnings.
PS…. I’m sorry Mike
I never called them thieves or anything bad. Read the post I was actually defending them.. im just trying to get paid. I played with jazz for years and they took thousands! So when I go on run I kinda expect my money but I knew it would be something it always is. I played fair and square. & even if there is a glitch im still owed 15K…. I need right before Christmas
no worries, good luck with itPS…. I’m sorry Mike
I never called them thieves or anything bad. Read the post I was actually defending them.. im just trying to get paid. I played with jazz for years and they took thousands! So when I go on run I kinda expect my money but I knew it would be something it always is. I played fair and square. & even if there is a glitch im still owed 15K…. I need right before Christmas
It would never be profit's doubled. It'd be winning hands paid double. But no sense continuing to argue that since Jazz wasn't saying that was the issue.If my profit was so doubled from a “glitch” then taking away the double means cutting it in half.
if i was reading the spreadsheet correctly, the problem looked like losses weren't being taken out, unless someone could really push 18 hands in a row lolThe running balance would be suspect if said player was getting double pays. Likely at some point he was likely out of funds but the double pays kept his balance above zero.....
If there were double pays.
I agree with this. Casino could argue that because of double payment , when OP would have been bankrupt he was saved by it and was able to keep playing to make a profit.The running balance would be suspect if said player was getting double pays. Likely at some point he was likely out of funds but the double pays kept his balance above zero.....
If there were double pays.
this has never been answered or explainedhelp me with the confusion then... for example on page 4/220 (and 114/220 for the other half) there looks like a chunk of 6 straight hands where all 3 hands were a 0 result? there is no possible way that someone would have all 3 hands push 6 straight times, odds of that even happening 4 in a row would be less than 1 in a trillion.