Mexican Underdogs are Profitable... Hell No!

Top Sportsbooks

9.9

Bovada

75% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.8

BetOnline

100% Free Play
Read Review
9.6

Heritage Sports

50% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.6

BetAnySports

30% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.5

Everygame

100% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.5

Bookmaker

25% Cash Bonus
Read Review

Headsterx

Headsterx

Joined
Oct 22, 2021
Messages
5,693
So there's a theory that in the long run Mexican underdogs are profitable. Just because underdog Ryan Garcia won I'm not buying this theory at all. So I'm going to track this for slightly over one year (don't know what major bout will be on May 3, 2005, but it should be one involving a Mexican). And what better way to track this theory right before Cinco de Mayo. Obviously, not doing Mexican v. Mexican. For instance, Canelo Alvarez v. Jaime Munguia (+375) won't count. Nor boxing exhibition which I highly doubt we'll see any Mexican boxers do a stupid exhibition as that ain't fighting. I'll only be using Betonline for odds. And if the fight doesn't have odds @ Betonline, then I'm not including it. And no wanna be Mexican like Carlos Mencia, if he was a boxer... lol.

This is going to be brutal.
 

Headsterx

Headsterx

Joined
Oct 22, 2021
Messages
5,693
Did you watch the game, Heads?

I'm looking at the result and looks like Garcia is good. It also says this is Haney's first loss of his pro career.

View attachment 32958

We will wait for your theory's update as you keep track of them in the future. :cheers:
Yeah, I saw it and it was a great fight. Totally was shocked he won but the way so many are taking it is that he’s the best. He got worked by Devonta and lost.

I think this theory is ridiculous as off the top my head I remembered Mexican underdogs losing way too frequent to make it profitable. Manny Pacquiao wasn’t called “Mexican killer” for no apparent reasons. Though I thought he lost one of those fights, he beat them. Mayweather beat a few of them, too. Don’t get me wrong, Mexican fighters are great, but when I see them as underdogs, there’s a reason why.
 

BMR Genie

BMR Genie

Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
22,838
Yeah, I saw it and it was a great fight. Totally was shocked he won but the way so many are taking it is that he’s the best. He got worked by Devonta and lost.

I think this theory is ridiculous as off the top my head I remembered Mexican underdogs losing way too frequent to make it profitable. Manny Pacquiao wasn’t called “Mexican killer” for no apparent reasons. Though I thought he lost one of those fights, he beat them. Mayweather beat a few of them, too. Don’t get me wrong, Mexican fighters are great, but when I see them as underdogs, there’s a reason why.
I agree, though sometimes I also feel they are overrated.
 

edawg

edawg

Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
1,514
Yeah, I saw it and it was a great fight. Totally was shocked he won but the way so many are taking it is that he’s the best. He got worked by Devonta and lost.

I think this theory is ridiculous as off the top my head I remembered Mexican underdogs losing way too frequent to make it profitable. Manny Pacquiao wasn’t called “Mexican killer” for no apparent reasons. Though I thought he lost one of those fights, he beat them. Mayweather beat a few of them, too. Don’t get me wrong, Mexican fighters are great, but when I see them as underdogs, there’s a reason why.
Believe Pacquiao is half Spanish and Filipinos have a good amount of Mexican throughout their bloodlines.
 

BMR Genie

BMR Genie

Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
22,838
So there's a theory that in the long run Mexican underdogs are profitable. Just because underdog Ryan Garcia won I'm not buying this theory at all. So I'm going to track this for slightly over one year (don't know what major bout will be on May 3, 2005, but it should be one involving a Mexican). And what better way to track this theory right before Cinco de Mayo. Obviously, not doing Mexican v. Mexican. For instance, Canelo Alvarez v. Jaime Munguia (+375) won't count. Nor boxing exhibition which I highly doubt we'll see any Mexican boxers do a stupid exhibition as that ain't fighting. I'll only be using Betonline for odds. And if the fight doesn't have odds @ Betonline, then I'm not including it. And no wanna be Mexican like Carlos Mencia, if he was a boxer... lol.

This is going to be brutal.
Is it okay to bet on yourself in boxing? I am seeing this article now about Garcia betting on himself to beat Haney.

1714074310180.png
 

BMR Genie

BMR Genie

Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
22,838
Oh yeah, you can bet on yourself to win. Mayweather did this several times, and of course always won. The only red flag would be if you bet on yourself to lose... lol.
Oh si! I forgot Mayweather did it. I think he bet himself to win against Pacquiao. Imagine if all sports allow this.

So Garcia won his bet worth $12M + his payday from that fight! What a winner haha
 
Top