Can a poker guru explain this to me?

Top Sportsbooks

9.9

Bovada

75% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.8

BetOnline

100% Free Play
Read Review
9.6

Heritage Sports

50% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.6

BetAnySports

30% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.5

Everygame

100% Cash Bonus
Read Review
9.5

Bookmaker

25% Cash Bonus
Read Review

stormtrooper8

stormtrooper8

Joined
May 30, 2022
Messages
9,736

Hunch

Hunch

Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
2,346
The theory seems to be that she had a remote controlled vibrator 'installed', and whoever had the remote had access to the live card reader feed.

It was broadcast 'live', is there a delay?

If there is then her partner would need to be someone on the inside.
 

2the9s

2the9s

Joined
Nov 1, 2021
Messages
1,643
The theory is that she tanked long enough so that the delay on the live stream showed the beginning of the hand (along with the hole cards), and then someone somehow relayed that information to her.

My theory is that
. Anyone else think she's transgender? There's definitely been a lot of work done on her.
 

BobbyFK

BobbyFK

Joined
Oct 19, 2021
Messages
17,032
The theory seems to be that she had a remote controlled vibrator 'installed', and whoever had the remote had access to the live card reader feed.

It was broadcast 'live', is there a delay?

If there is then her partner would need to be someone on the inside.
I would think there would be a delay to prevent things like this
 

BigJay

BigJay

Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Messages
9,222
I’m not sure his argument holds water because if she knew he was on a draw, albeit a very strong one, why would she have agreed to run it twice?

agreed it was a very strange call tho
 

The Wanderer

The Wanderer

Joined
Oct 17, 2021
Messages
435
I’m not sure his argument holds water because if she knew he was on a draw, albeit a very strong one, why would she have agreed to run it twice?

agreed it was a very strange call tho
for appearances maybe? She looked guilty to me. Returning the money seals it. Why would she do that? Doesn't pass the smell test. She panicked when he said millions of people are going to see this.
 

fried cheese

fried cheese

Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Messages
181
I’m not sure his argument holds water because if she knew he was on a draw, albeit a very strong one, why would she have agreed to run it twice?

agreed it was a very strange call tho
running it twice would just reduce variance. garret had a higher chance to win the pot anyways but she had odds to call if she knew his hand. if she didnt know his hand then she has to be incredibly stupid and bad at poker and also be astronomically generous to just give back 130k+ because she didnt want him to be upset that he lost.

then she said she thought she had a 3 and that she didnt look back at her hand. she did look back at her hand for a long time after the all in bet and also told someone during the hand that she didnt have a 3 when asked.

i mean its possible that she is just really bad and really generous but what are the odds? unless she and her husband are billionaires or close then i would say she probably cheated.
 

vitterd

vitterd

Joined
Dec 24, 2021
Messages
4,381
Playing poker for many years….she 100 percent cheated. It’s not even a question. Somehow she was told she was good. It’s the only logical explanation. She can’t even explain why she called.
 

BigJay

BigJay

Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Messages
9,222
Playing poker for many years….she 100 percent cheated. It’s not even a question. Somehow she was told she was good. It’s the only logical explanation. She can’t even explain why she called.
Vit, you think she might have misread her hand? Only explanation I can think of
 

Hunch

Hunch

Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
2,346
I think most likely she's just a bad player.

Saw elsewhere that she normally plays smaller buy in tournaments.

She figured he was bluffing and called not considering that she had nothing also. Ended up married to the pot so she calls the all in too.
 

Enikk

Enikk

Joined
Oct 31, 2021
Messages
12,509
Am I the only one to think her look is nasty/trashy? To each their own but I hate the whole lips thing. Total turnoff. Maybe going for a Jolie look? No thanks. Sucks that women have to feel the need to keep getting stuff done.
 

rsstreams

rsstreams

Joined
Apr 28, 2022
Messages
143
The two top internet poker analysts suggest that the player is just an inexperienced player who was willing to pay off to see what someone had because the money wasn't that big of a deal, it just so happened she had the best hand. She is an inexperienced player that has just started to learn some nuances of the game and has stepped up quickly in stakes but would likely figure to lose quickly and become disinterested.

The reason the triggers from the control room wouldn't be involved is because the crew doing this particular stream have a ton of experience and wouldn't tarnish their reputation on such an awful fix of a game, such as the Mike Postle game.

She just made an awful play and doesn't even realize that trash-talking this type of scenario is just a real bad look. Ignorant to social aspects involved in hand-reading and tells. To carry it on later in social media was even more laughable.

Adelstein should accept any challenge to play heads up because he would be at a massive advantage.
 

2the9s

2the9s

Joined
Nov 1, 2021
Messages
1,643
Am I the only one to think her look is nasty/trashy? To each their own but I hate the whole lips thing. Total turnoff. Maybe going for a Jolie look? No thanks. Sucks that women have to feel the need to keep getting stuff done.
Personally I like the fake look, but in her case I think it goes a step further than that. I've already said my piece on this to no repsonse, but the surgery + big hands + height + sweater that minimizes the broadness of her shoulders makes me think she's got a bigger surprise than calling with J4.
 

BigJay

BigJay

Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Messages
9,222
The two top internet poker analysts suggest that the player is just an inexperienced player who was willing to pay off to see what someone had because the money wasn't that big of a deal, it just so happened she had the best hand. She is an inexperienced player that has just started to learn some nuances of the game and has stepped up quickly in stakes but would likely figure to lose quickly and become disinterested.

The reason the triggers from the control room wouldn't be involved is because the crew doing this particular stream have a ton of experience and wouldn't tarnish their reputation on such an awful fix of a game, such as the Mike Postle game.

She just made an awful play and doesn't even realize that trash-talking this type of scenario is just a real bad look. Ignorant to social aspects involved in hand-reading and tells. To carry it on later in social media was even more laughable.

Adelstein should accept any challenge to play heads up because he would be at a massive advantage.
This makes sense. I think she just let the situation get the best of her, made an awful call and happened to get very, very lucky
 
Top