Tennis French Open Yes/No with Bookmaker

[sportsbettor5]

This is all I've got right now.

Could this be a difference between the mobile/desktop versions of the site?

 

[biprob]

View attachment 13608
This is all I've got right now.

Could this be a difference between the mobile/desktop versions of the site?

From my

 

[caramba]

Thanks biprob and sportsbettor5. Biprop you clearly have more selections than us. I have only Swiatek, same with desktop and laptop.
Getting nowhere with their CS.

 

[Ace7550]

From my
View attachment 13609

This is what i've got too

 

[caramba]

I have now been told by them that it's a matter of recreational players vs non-recreational players. I can't really trust any information from the idiots working the chats, but I believe that's actually what has happened here, what they deem recreational players see all selections, what they deem non-recreational see only some.

I fully believe this was not meant to be applied like this for a big market like a tennis grand slam (the rec vs non-rec is usually for obscure stuff like Russian table tennis), but now that it has been set that way it's quite the challenge to get them to understand this and change it. I know this because it's happened in the past that they've set some markets for recreationals only, but once the info has gotten to the right person they have changed these settings, so that the markets have become available for all players.

Thanks again biprob, sportsbettor and ace for sharing this info. I believe I have all the info I need now.

 

[biprob]

I have now been told by them that it's a matter of recreational players vs non-recreational players. I can't really trust any information from the idiots working the chats, but I believe that's actually what has happened here, what they deem recreational players see all selections, what they deem non-recreational see only some.

I fully believe this was not meant to be applied like this for a big market like a tennis grand slam (the rec vs non-rec is usually for obscure stuff like Russian table tennis), but now that it has been set that way it's quite the challenge to get them to understand this and change it. I know this because it's happened in the past that they've set some markets for recreationals only, but once the info has gotten to the right person they have changed these settings, so that the markets have become available for all players.

Thanks again biprob, sportsbettor and ace for sharing this info. I believe I have all the info I need now.

Happy to help caramba..the reason for my interest in this thread is that I have an extremely vested interest in "Carliga" doing what they did at the USO in less than 2 wks from now. [assuming the Celtics do their part tonight]

 

[caramba]

oh wow. good call on the Boston comeback!
I believe more in Iga than Carlos to be honest. Carlos so prone to throw in a crap performance every now and then, even if he looked good today. And Novak is a beast in bo5, even when he has looked rough in the lead-ups so he's my pick! But I've been wrong in my predictions many times so my input might be best to ignore

 

[biprob]

oh wow. good call on the Boston comeback!
I believe more in Iga than Carlos to be honest. Carlos so prone to throw in a crap performance every now and then, even if he looked good today. And Novak is a beast in bo5, even when he has looked rough in the lead-ups so he's my pick! But I've been wrong in my predictions many times so my input might be best to ignore

Not so much so on to the next

 

[caramba]

yeah would have been less painful for you if Boston just lost in 4!

Odds up for all selections for all players now. When I point it out to them for days and send them detailed explainations with screenshots of exactly what has gone wrong, they refuse to admit that it's a mistake and that it's designed to be like that by upper management and that it's final decision etc. Then I point out the same thing to a trader there I know (he hasn't been in in a while) and he tells them the same thing they sort it within hours.

 

[biprob]

yeah would have been less painful for you if Boston just lost in 4!

Odds up for all selections for all players now. When I point it out to them for days and send them detailed explainations with screenshots of exactly what has gone wrong, they refuse to admit that it's a mistake and that it's designed to be like that by upper management and that it's final decision etc. Then I point out the same thing to a trader there I know (he hasn't been in in a while) and he tells them the same thing they sort it within hours.

It's stuff like this why I stopped playing offshore as soon as online betting became legal in NY early last year. Basic stuff like worrying about them accusing me of past posting, intentionally betting a "bad" line if I ever really hit a big bet just wasn't worth the aggravation. Obv. as you pointed out customer service is a joke if you ever want anything resolved. Unfortunately this bet went sideways but when I hit this parlay for over 98k in Jan I never worried about FanDuel honoring the bet & paying it [cashed out 78k which was in my checking account within 5 days]. Not saying Bookmaker wouldn't have done the same but I can't even parlay tennis Futures there so this type of bet would've never even been an option.

 

[infotimbo]

I have now been told by them that it's a matter of recreational players vs non-recreational players. I can't really trust any information from the idiots working the chats, but I believe that's actually what has happened here, what they deem recreational players see all selections, what they deem non-recreational see only some.

at Bookmaker, it always felt more like regional restrictions to me.

Things like Challenger Tennis or Parlays were disabled around the same time for several people (from the same country) I know, at least, no matter if they were even using those betting options/markets.

This is also still the case for me - but those Yes/No French Open Futures I can see.

 

[sportsbettor5]

Basic stuff like worrying about them accusing me of past posting, intentionally betting a "bad" line if I ever really hit a big bet just wasn't worth the aggravation.

I don't have the sense that this is more likely to happen at BM than at FanDuel. Has BM done this to you?

those Yes/No French Open Futures I can see

So I guess @caramba is correct that different accounts have different betting menus. I guess it's a risk management thing, with "sharp" accounts not allowed to play softer markets.

 

[biprob]

No since I've never won more than 20k but if I remember correctly you had over 1M in there & were regularly WD 25k daily in BTC & you didn't have any issues. My main gripe with them is how restrictive they are when it comes to parlaying Futures. Not having SGPs I don't care about [totally favors the book] but not being able to place those bets that I showed makes them obsolete & a total non-starter ever again.

 

[infotimbo]

My main gripe with them is how restrictive they are when it comes to parlaying Futures.

as mentioned above, not allowing parlays at all (no matter what kind of sport or betting type) is also one of their restrictions. As far as I understood, this affects all European accounts, for example.

 

[caramba]

No men's tennis pick winner at all offered tonight available for me and I don't know if that's because they just haven't odds up yet, or if they messed up again and disabled everything for non-recreational customers after having finally made everything available yesterday.

 

[sportsbettor5]

No men's tennis pick winner at all offered tonight available for me and I don't know if that's because they just haven't odds up yet, or if they messed up again and disabled everything for non-recreational customers after having finally made everything available yesterday.

FYI same thing for me. Lots of women's selections, none for men.

 

[caramba]

they finally got lines up for the men. I think they were just not available for anyone earlier, so at least it wasn't the rec vs non rec thing.