South Carolina’s next governor could play a major role in determining whether the state expands legalized gambling, including sports betting and casino gaming, or maintains its status as one of the strictest anti-gambling states in the nation, allowing only a state lottery and charitable bingo. While residents wait for local legislation to evolve, we recommend consulting our sportsbook reviews to easily compare odds and find the best offshore betting options available today.
The Great Gaming Divide
Although governors cannot independently change state gambling laws, their support or opposition can heavily influence whether legislation reaches the finish line. With Gov. Henry McMaster leaving office due to term limits, candidates in both parties are drawing distinctions on an issue that has long divided lawmakers.
Among the current gubernatorial contenders, positions on expanding gambling in the Palmetto State vary widely. One candidate has expressed support for allowing a casino in South Carolina under limited circumstances, while several others remain firmly opposed. Some candidates favor giving voters the final say through a statewide referendum, and at least one Republican has indicated openness to forms of gambling other than casino development.
The gambling industry is watching the race closely. Advocates believe the political climate is becoming more favorable as newer lawmakers replace legislators who experienced the state’s contentious battles over video poker during the 1990s. Industry supporters are expected to push aggressively for legalization efforts in upcoming legislative sessions.
A proposal backed by Republicans to establish a casino along the Interstate 95 corridor gained bipartisan support in the House last year and reached the floor for consideration. However, lawmakers ultimately returned the bill to committee, effectively ending its chances during an election year. Even so, Senate Minority Leader Brad Hutto has pledged to reintroduce the legislation as navigating the shifting landscape of U.S. betting law becomes a focal point for the region. Meanwhile, we continue to monitor these legal developments to help you find the safest, top-rated platforms to securely place your wagers.
The debate surfaced during the first Republican gubernatorial forum, where U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman vowed to oppose casino expansion and suggested that some candidates had accepted money from gambling interests.
Campaign finance reports show that both Attorney General Alan Wilson and Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette received contributions linked to Greenville developer Wallace Cheves, whose company is behind the proposed casino project. Those donations represented only a small fraction of each campaign’s overall fundraising totals.
Supporters argue that a casino could generate jobs, attract investment, and stimulate economic growth in struggling rural communities. Democrat Billy Webster said he would support a single casino if local governments and residents benefited directly and if infrastructure improvements accompanied the project. Former candidate Josh Kimbrell voiced a similar view before withdrawing from the race, suggesting that economically distressed areas might be appropriate locations.
Not Everyone’s a Fan
Opponents raise concerns about crime, addiction, and human trafficking. Democrat Mullins McLeod and Republicans Ralph Norman and Rom Reddy have all spoken against casino legalization. Attorney General Wilson has also cited objections from law enforcement and faith-based groups, arguing that any financial gains would be mitigated by societal costs, including a spike in problem gambling.
Reddy pointed specifically to concerns about trafficking near casino properties and argued that claims of economic development often overlook potential social consequences. At the same time, he said he does not oppose adults participating in other forms of gambling, including online sports betting.
Evette has taken a more cautious approach. While she agrees with McMaster that communities should not rely on gambling for revenue, she has stopped short of promising a veto if casino legislation reaches her desk. Instead, she has emphasized the importance of listening to local communities before making decisions. She has also indicated a willingness to consider legal wagering on horse racing as a way to support South Carolina’s equine industry.
Democrat Jermaine Johnson and Republican Nancy Mace have both suggested that voters should decide the issue directly. Johnson, whose family experienced financial hardship related to gambling addiction, said any expansion should include safeguards and funding for addiction treatment and anti-trafficking programs. Mace noted that many South Carolinians are already participating in prediction markets, which operate under federal financial regulations and have created new challenges for state-level oversight.
The current debate reflects broader changes within the General Assembly. Many lawmakers who fought against video poker decades ago have left office, and legislative turnover has reshaped the political landscape. But a change in the executive office could portend whether gambling expands or maintains the status quo. As the landscape shifts, we are dedicated to guiding you toward trusted platforms that not only offer the best market odds but also work closely with reputable gambling support organizations to ensure a safe, responsible betting environment.
